Short Saturday: Brodkey, Munro, and Kundera

In Short Saturday I will journal my journey to find 5-star quality short stories, whose virtual trophy right now is only held by Truman Capote for A Christmas Memory. Unlike my book reviews, I will talk more about my thoughts and what I learn, why I choose the story and how I come upon it. Unlike books, I’m willing to take more risk for shorts, because they are.. well.. short, so I won’t waste too much time if I don’t like them. Expect to see a lot of trash and hopefully, some gems. As it is now, I am not a fan of short stories. Dare I say, yet? But hey, like people say, it’s all about the journey, not destination.

My Mistress's Sparrow is Dead The great thing about shorts is that I can taste a bunch of writers in bite size portion and see if I’d like to read more of them. A couple of months ago I browsed the library to find this great sounding anthology edited by Jeffrey Eugenides (my favorite author!) titled My Mistress’s Sparrow is Dead: Great Love Stories from Chekov to Munro. There are many big names inside, a lot that I’m interested to read.

There’s introduction by Eugenides at the beginning, which after you read, you’d quickly realize that this won’t be a collection of sappy love stories. It’s more of a twisted-complicated one, which is exactly my cup of tea!

“Please keep in mind: my subject here isn’t love. My subject is the love story.

When it comes to love, there are a million theories to explain it. But when it comes to love stories, things are simpler. A love story can never be about full possession. The happy marriage, the requited love, the desire that never dims–these are lucky eventualities but they aren’t love stories. Love stories depend on disappointment, on unequal births and feuding families, on matrimonial boredom and at least one cold heart. Love stories, nearly without exception, give love a bad name.

We value love not because it’s stronger than death but because it’s weaker. Say what you want about love: death will finish it. You will not go on loving in the grave, not in any physical way that will at all resemble love as we know it on earth. The perishable nature of love is what gives love its profound importance in our lives. If it were endless, if it were on tap, love wouldn’t hit us the way it does.

~ Jeffrey Eugenides, Introduction

As I mentioned earlier, I vowed not to bog down myself with obsessive-compulsiveness to read everything in a collection of short stories and let the randomness takes me. The first story that I chose was one that Eugenides mentioned in his introduction, about a Harvard’s senior attempt to bring his girlfriend to her first orgasm by means of act of cunnilingus. Really, the plot line sounded ridiculous, so I caved. Also, the writer, Harold Brodkey, is the only author in the book that has two short stories. Everyone else only gets one space!

Innocence by Harold Brodkey

Unfortunately, Innocence contains the longest non-sexy sex scene I have ever read (and probably ever will). Like I said, the plot sounded ridiculous. Almost the entire story is set in bed, with the guy performs the act, thinking about other stuff during. It was sooo tiring and looong. I think I was just as frustrated as him seeing that the girlfriend doesn’t JUST come! After pages and pages of futile effort, I started to skim read. I just wanted it to end. My head was going to explode. Just come you b*tch!, I was screaming in my head.

Finally she does, they both cry, and the story ends.

Not the greatest start-up I’m telling you.

Thinking that I shouldn’t take too big of a risk for the next short, I chose the one by Alice Munro. I heard so much about her and I just learned that she ONLY writes short stories. Amazing how you can be so famous only writing short stories. She must be really good.

The Bear Came Over the Mountain by Alice Munro

Eva mentioned in her review that it’s like Munro’s version of The Notebook. Exactly what I thought! At first. Further on, not so much. The story is about an old married couple. Fiona starts to show symptoms of Alzheimer disease, so she’s moved to a facility home, away from Grant, her husband. As time passes, Fiona starts to forget about Grant. She makes friends with another guy in the nursing home, who she gets more attached to than her own husband, which annoys Grant. We get to learn from Grant’s reminiscence of their past that he has not always been faithful, though not because they were unhappy (So why? I have no idea).

I have to admit, story about very old people doesn’t entice me most of the time. This one has enough depth and was quite skilfully written that it kept my attention the whole way through. I couldn’t much guess where it was going too, which was a plus. Odd thing is, I could never figure out the meaning of the title. There’s NO bear.

The story first appeared in The New Yorker (link to full story) on 27 December 1999. Made into a movie titled Away From Her (2006), nominated for 2 Oscars (Best Actress and Best Screenplay). Would love to see that one.

The Hitchhiking Game by Milan Kundera

I have wanted to read Kundera’s books for the longest time. Alas, I have not. Good thing his short story is featured in the anthology, and it was good according to claire and Eva. The story is originally included in Kundera’s collection Laughable Loves.

The Hitchhiking Game looks at a young couple who’s going on a road trip. When they stop for gas, the girlfriend wanders ahead. When the guy picks her up, they pretend that the girl is a hitchhiker and they don’t know each other. The girl becomes more brazen, unlike her usual shy self, because that’s what she imagines a hitchhiker to be. The guy starts to treat her with less respect, because he sees her like other wild-natured women whom he doesn’t like. They get more and more mixed up in the game until it gets difficult to tell what’s real and what’s not.

Excellent premise and Kundera delivered! I’m happy to find that his writing is not hard to read, so I look forward to reading his books!

And the journey continues…

(I actually read the three stories in 2009, so you’ll find them on Books and Shorts Read in 2009)

Let me know if you’ve posted any thoughts on the stories, because I couldn’t find any apart from the ones linked above!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

19 thoughts on “Short Saturday: Brodkey, Munro, and Kundera”

  1. Hi Mee, I havent read any of these so I can’t actually be of any help am afraid. If its any consolation though I now want to read the latter two for definite. I have always been worried that Kundera would be too complex for me. Maybe that is all in my head?

  2. Glad you liked the Kundera! He’s actually very accessible; only, the readers who do not gel with him are the ones who think he’s too philosophical and “boring.” But if you like delving into people’s minds, his work will definitely fascinate.

    I also read Munro’s collection where THe Bear Went Over the Mountain was featured. I posted about the collection as a whole, though (Hateship Friendship Courtship Loveship Marriage). Her writing is so subtle but poignant.
    .-= [claire´s last blog: Mrs Dalloway] =-.

    1. Claire- I think I might like Kundera’s work. It sounds like something I would like. I like Munro’s subtle writing too. It reminds me of Ishiguro perhaps? I’ll definitely read more of her stories. Thanks for the info of the collection, I’ll add that in my post.

    1. Jenny- I don’t know who Catullus is (I just checked Wiki), but yes I think the title is taken from some Latin story. Eugenides mentioned it in the Introduction. I can’t remember the details.

  3. First. We must think very much alike. At the start of the year, I was thinking, I should do reviews on short stories every week, say Sunday. Encouraging myself to read more short stories, you know. And here you are, doing it on Saturday!! Is this going to be a weekly thing? I think I’ll join you next week. =)

    I haven’t read anything by those three authors you mentioned, but Eugenides’ introduction does sound intriguing (and it’s seducing me to start on Middlesex right away!). I’ve also heard many great things about Milan Kundera, and his books usually have such beautiful titles. I’m going to have to try squeeze him in this year.
    .-= [Michelle (su[shu])´s last blog: [SS] Brokeback Mountain – Annie Proulx (plus a little of something else)] =-.

    1. Yay that’s great! I’m not sure if I’m going to do it every week, but occasionally yes. I know that C.B. James is doing it on Saturday too. Saturday seems to make a good title for Short Saturday :). It’s great if we can do this together!

      I’m gonna try to read Kundera’s book too this year. I hope I can squeeze him in!

  4. Love the new feature, mee! I’m all for discovering new short stories and this is an anthology that I’ve had my eye on (I think I’ve already mentioned that in relation to the Love Quarrels collection).

    Milan Kundera is more accessible than one would think and is very like Franz Kafka in that respect. Is it because we are reading in translation that we are intimidated and immediately think they will difficult?

    I read Alice Munro at Uni a long time ago and didn’t get on very well with her so have always been reluctant to read more; I suspect that my feelings may have changed and I’m more receptive outwith the academic setting.
    .-= [Paperback_Reader´s last blog: Hibernation] =-.

    1. Love Quarrels collection sounds great! I just searched for it at your blog and I remember reading your review back then. I’m gonna plug it here in case anybody wants to know which one:

      I got the impression that Kundera and Kafka were “philosophical”, so that’s probably what makes we think they’re difficult. I’ve been meaning to read both for ages though. Hope I can do it this year.

      I’m still unsure about Munro, because I just read one story, but I’m willing to try more.

  5. I’ve sat with this book at the bookstore countless times. I’ve read the intro and everything, but never actually bought it. I need to! I love the Munro story, which I’ve read before, and really need to see the movie. The Kundera one sounds excellent too.
    .-= [Nymeth´s last blog: Again] =-.

    1. Funny thing, because I never knew about the book’s existence before I saw it at the library. It’s one of those times where you just make a great impulsive pick!

  6. I just noticed you’ve already read Raymond Carver’s Cathedral! I’m envious!

    I, too, don’t usually find stories about “very old people” enticing. But I’m really curious about Munro because I keep hearing how evocative her writing is. I already have one of her books, The View from Castle Rock, but I haven’t yet started it.
    .-= [Mark David´s last blog: The New Yorker Fiction Podcast] =-.

    1. Mm I thought we talked about Raymond Carver or Cathedral, but it was probably not on the blog post.

      Alice Munro has so many books so I don’t know which one to pick! I know that she has one short story titled Jakarta though, so I’m interested to read that one. Whether it’s about Jakarta the city, I do not know…

        1. And I was sure you had mentioned something similar in the past about Carver. But I couldn’t find the proof on the Carver’s post. You probably said it at another post. Or email.
          It could also be just my imagination :P

Leave a Reply